New International Heritage and Conservation News blog

It seems like an age ago that I blogged about the use of the web, particularly blogging, to communicate better issues related to heritage conservation, particularly as it is a field in the broader heritage sector which is perhaps most shrouded in mystery. Communication has tended to be aimed purely at the professional with public understanding of conservation lower than it might be.

ICOMOS-UK’s new website, based around a blog, is now live. After a marathon month of literally pulling up the hand-break on this web project and changing direction, a completely new and different approach was taken to help the organisation make the most of the web and its audience: quickly and all on a shoe-string [note: what on earth are 'shoe-strings' in this sense?] Without going into too much detail about the background to this, the original plan for a redeveloped website, overseen and directed by me, especially the creation of new content, but technically put together by a company who had promised to sponsor the project, fell through.
Continue reading ‘New International Heritage and Conservation News blog’

Share and Enjoy:
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb

Making People Believe text now online

Back in April, I blogged about a new article on archaeological computing written by myself and two colleagues. It is entitled “Making People Believe” and appeared in the 100th edition of the Council for British Archaeology’s British Archaeology magazine.

I am happy to announce that the full text of Making People Believe is now online (without images due to restrictive copyright agreements).

Feel free to discuss the article in a comment below.

Share and Enjoy:
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb

‘What do you want the future of Seaton Delaval to be?’ and ‘Will you help?’

These are the words of the National Trust’s Director-General, Fiona Reynolds on a new kind of campaign by the trust to get the public to decide the future of Seaton Delaval Hall, its gardens, grounds and a large area of countryside in south Northumberland near Blyth.

The Trust intend to purchase the house and its estate to save it for the nation in perpetuity. It is willing to back the purchase with £6m of its own money but needs to raise a further £6m from public appeal, fundraising and public grants.

Romantic and partly-ruined, Seaton Delaval was built between 1718 and 1731 by Sir John Vanbrugh, architect of Blenheim Palace and Castle Howard, and is widely said be the finest work of the English Baroque and one of the most important historic houses in Britain.

In quite a firm statement, the NT’s Trustees have said that without public support, both in terms of fundraising and the public demonstrating a desire for the acquisition to take place, they will not proceed with the acquisition.

This announcement comes hot on the heels of the announcement yesterday of a new Chairman for the National Trust, Simon Jenkins, well-known as a newspaper editor, journalist, writer and heritage conservation campaigner. There have been no big pronouncements from him about his appointment and the future of the Trust which is a refreshing change.

So is this a one-off for the Trust and similar bodies? Does the public have to decide such things? Or is this a genuine attempt to change the way society deals with the conservation and preservation of the country’s past? The latest news on their website does not mention the Seaton Delaval campaign but then again the press release was only received 23 minutes ago. However, if I have managed to blog it, I should think they could do the same. I do hope their campaign will properly use such methods to communicate and raise its profile. I watch with intense interest.

Share and Enjoy:
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb

Conservation and communication

Recently Tom blogged about the prospect of the National Trust’s massive investment into digital technologies, including the web. Electric Acorns is a great new blog started by a an NT employee and devoted to peeling back some of the layers of the great institution in an effort to allow the public and fellow professionals a better insight into all the work the Trust does (see his comment below).

Institutions involved with promoting, undertaking or advising on the conservation of historic environments and artefacts are not great at communicating their work. I often wonder, if they were, whether the tensions between access and preservation could be better ‘managed’ (to use a phrase en vogue) but at the very least, better understood by the wider public, and whether funders and politicians would regard conservation as being a cultural activity of the highest value to society and therefore less willing to withdraw or withold support (see my post on the Textile Conservation Centre’s closure).

Interest in history, the past and the environment has never been more keen than it is now. Neither has it been more easy to have your say in front of a global audience with the internet revolution. Why aren’t more institutions involved with conservation adopting open and honest communication with the public through the web in the form of blogs, web forums, podcasts and more? Matthew of Electric Acorns is taking a step forward for his organisation (I do hope they appreciate it). What is everyone else doing? Here’s a short survey. Continue reading ‘Conservation and communication’

Share and Enjoy:
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb

More Creative Commons Archaeology Data

Framework Archaeology (a joint venture between Wessex Archaeology and Oxford Archaeology) have just released data from the excavations at Stansted Airport from between 1999 and 2004.

The data is released under an Attribution Non-Commercial Creative Commons license. This is good news for archaeologists and other interested parties to be able to reuse and share the data, and another step forward towards opening up data about our past.

Framework Archaeology also distribute a (Windows-based) free data viewer, which provides basic GIS functionality for viewing the Stansted and Heathrow Terminal 5 data. The installation process is simple - download the Free Viewer (as it is called) and run the installer. Then download the dataset, run the dataset installer, launch the software, and explore away…

For those that just want the raw Stansted data, the formats for download include csv, xml, gml, shp, data dictionary, photos (jpg), and sections (jpg).

The excavation data for Heathrow Terminal 5 was released by Framework Archaeology in a similar way last August.

Making data from such an important archaeological excavation is a great philosophical move, and I do hope that more organisations follow suit. The key will be to see what (if anything) people do with this data…

Share and Enjoy:
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb

The National Trust goes digital - Some news and some ideas

Professional Fundraising reports that The National Trust are to invest £4.6m in an “e-roadmap” to embrace mobile and web technologies to enhance visitor interactions at their properties.

Picture this. As you walk through the gates of a National Trust property, your phone buzzes in your pocket. A welcome message directs you to a mobile web page where you can find extra information about what to do during your visit and download an audio guide. No need to search for your membership card either – your phone, with online access to your membership details, will do the trick.

As an NT member myself, I use their website to find out information about properties, but currently this information is limited to basic details such as opening hours and facilities. I get a guidebook posted to me each year which contains similar information.

To hear that they are to invest in modern information systems is great news. I have always thought that, given the Trust’s portfolio of properties, there is fantastic potential for creating a kind of social network to go alongside it. To be able to explore more in-depth information about each property would be fantastic, but there are benefits beyond simply making more information about its properties online.

Membership

I am sure that this approach will help to boost NT membership. It will attract more younger people to join the Trust, which is essential for its future. Am I alone in thinking, when I read the NT magazine, that the adverts are mainly aimed at the retired? I would like to see more balance, and this could be a good step towards achieving that (he says, knowing little about their membership demographics).

What kind of approaches would I like to see in this new “visitor experience”? The information on the Professional Fundraiser website talks about mobile phone ownership amongst current members. I would not necessarily associate mobile ownership with computer literacy, but it does say that they are “more likely to use the internet”. Mobile data is still expensive, and location-based services are in their infancy, but if this is a long-term goal, there is fantastic potential for development here.

Location based services

Many of the Trust’s properties have extensive grounds. Using an internet-connected device with GPS (like Nokia’s N95, forthcoming GPS enabled 3G iPhone, etc) rich content could be delivered directly to the user as they wander around (or follow a suggested route on their device). Websites like Socialight already offer this kind of functionality via a Java applet than can be easily installed on your phone. I have experimented with this to good effect in Salisbury using a tour of prominent medieval buildings put together by Wessex Archaeology. You can even theoretically choose to be alerted when you walk past something in your list of interests. I’d love to see it used more widely.

Social Networking

Social networking is all the rage at the moment. It almost seems as if a day doesn’t go past without another one popping into existence. Facebook, MySpace, Bebo, Ning, etc etc etc. Some of the smaller, more specialist networks are already fading away under the deluge. So why a social network for the National Trust? If they were to foster one, it could be a real, thriving success. Why? Because it has a winning formula.

What the Trust has going for it, is it’s key asset: it’s properties. Hundreds of historic houses, and hundreds of miles of coastal and countryside landscapes. It has people who visit and use them. And many of them use the internet. Scattered across the internet are photographs of Trust land, houses, objects etc, blog posts, forum discussions, etc. People are already interacting digitally in their own ways. A National Trust social networking site could act very effectively as a hub for all of this information, as well as providing its own interpretive information.

There are tools out there to make this achievable quite quickly and effectively. Google Friend Connect, for example, could be used to build a social network around properties. It would allow people to plug in to other networks such as Facebook, as well as discuss and rate properties.

User-generated content could be submitted, perhaps using a series of Flickr groups for photographs of properties that could be integrated back into their website via the Flickr API (there is already an unofficial National Trust Flickr group). Videos via YouTube. Integrate events with Upcoming, webcasts via ustream.tv could be utilised to show special events. Knit it all back together into the new NT website via web services. Visitors, potential visitors, and those who cannot get to the UK would all benefit.

Awareness

The Trust’s own content could be made available in numerous ways for people to use on their own websites perhaps under a Creative Commons license.

The Trust would benefit in return from a massive boost in awareness of their work, and hopefully help to give them a new image that appeals to an even wider audience.

The possibilities are boundless, and I’m quite excited to see what they come up with.

Share and Enjoy:
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb

Making People Believe - Article in British Archaeology Magazine

British Archaeology Magazine 100The 100th edition of British Archaeology magazine contains a feature article co-written by myself, Leif Isaksen, and Paul Cripps. I am lucky (or unlucky?!) to grace the front cover (that’s me, bottom left next to the giant flint).

The article, entitled “Making People Believe” is about the state of archaeological computing today, where it has come from, and where we believe it is going. The official blurb is as follows:

When computers were new, the buzz was about science and sums. Now digital technology is commonplace, say Leif Isaksen, Tom Goskar and Paul Cripps, the impact on archaeology is to assist open participation and intuitive analysis. They show just a few of the ways this might happen.

I came up with the idea of writing the article after a discussion about the dwindling numbers of people studying archaeological computing at universities. Many people are still surprised when I explain what I do - the connection between archaeologists and computers isn’t one that is very often made.

We perhaps are responsible for remaining too “back stage” with our work. I felt that it was time that we did something positive for our profile, beginning with an article in an archaeology publication that people could actually buy in shops for not much money. Most archaeologists prefer to publish in relatively (relative to interested people outside the profession) obscure peer-reviewed journals that only large university libraries can afford to buy. We publish to ourselves an awful lot.

In a few months time, the text of Making People Believe will be available for free online on the British Archaeology website. It doesn’t get much more open and accessible than that (other than printing it and posting it through letterboxes).

A quick word about the title. We (the authors) had a working title, the rather unimpressive but descriptive “Archaeology in the Digital Age”, but the editor decided to choose something else for the final cut. Personally speaking, it’s not a title I particularly like, but hopefully the words of the feature itself will speak for themselves.

So if you’d like to learn how archaeologists use computers, and how silicon has become more ubiquitous than steel, as well as a raft of other excellent features, head down to your local newsagents (well, Borders and WH Smith at least) and for £4.25 the most excellent 100th edition of British Archaeology can be yours.

Share and Enjoy:
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb

Past Horizons online archaeology magazine

David Connolly and Maggie Struckmeier of British Archaeological Jobs Resource (BAJR) fame, also run a website called Past Horizons. It highlights opportunities for amateur or professional archaeologists to participate in projects around the globe. It’s a great website, with project listings, forums for those who want to talk to others about their experiences abroad, a blog (where David and Maggie make themselves very approachable if you have a question), and now, an online magazine.

You can read Past Horizons either on Scribd or via the rather fancy full-screen digipage version, which even curls the page as you turn it, complete with playable videos. It’s well worth checking out.

Past Horizons

Share and Enjoy:
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb

Why close the Textile Conservation Centre?

Conservation has been high in my thoughts recently. Largely through my current work with ICOMOS-UK (International Council on Monuments and Sites UK) I have been exposed to the vicissitudes that affect the preservation and interpretation of our heritage, whether they are the result of inappropriate development, lack of funds or lack of collective and political will to stand up for cultural heritage as a fundamental part of modern society.

However, most upsetting, shocking, and all those things has been the news that the University of Southampton has decided to close down the Textile Conservation Centre at its Winchester Campus in late 2009 only a decade after it moved here from Hampton Court Palace. The reason given is financial, in short, that the University expects all its schools to fund themselves and the TCC, it was deemed, was not able to do this. I do not want to go into all the reasons given here. You can read up on it from the links below. A quick Google search will also show the coverage of the closure in the national press.

Read the University of Southampton’s statement
Read ICON’s statement
Save the Textile Conservation Centre blog

The whole business is personally distasteful to me. I am currently undertaking freelance work for the university, it is my alma mater. I therefore feel deeply embarrassed. I was a graduate of the Textile Conservation Centre in 2001 (MA Museum Studies) and maintain that my time there was intellectually the most stimulating experience of my life. Following this, my work on their research project on deliberately concealed garments produced one of the early attempts at getting collections online - and lit my passion for using the web to communicate our heritage. It has taken me a while to gather my thoughts - even now it seems daft to be writing about this. I could be writing about the government’s decision to close the British Museum or a local authority’s decision to level an ancient monument to make way for houses or offices. The feelings such things conjour are much the same. The futility of it all. Value for money, after all, is what exactly? After the anger and astonishment, the profound sadness.

As conservation (in the sense we understand it in heritage) is in every sense about ‘past thinking’ it seemed a good idea to talk about this here. Whatever the financial case made for the TCC’s closure, what is very clear is that this was certainly not a purely financial decision. The university was not itself going to go under because the TCC was using slightly more than it was contributing in monetary terms at least. Where there is a will there is a way. Sadly, Southampton had no will to continue to support one of its own ‘key distinctors’. Neither does it have the wisdom to realise the consequences of this action. The loss is not just Southampton’s or the UK’s, but the world’s. Organisations across the globe sent their people to the TCC to gain requisite skills in textile conservation and in museology, and take them back home. The combination was unique and they produced uniquely skilled graduates, the majority of whom have found very fulfilling careers in heritage, culture and conservation.

Here is a clear case of not taking responsibility, of not listening, of mis-judging and of being dishonourable. Universities ought to exist to further the bounds of human knowledge. It perplexes me to try and understand what has gone so wrong at Southampton. The one major source of funding for the TCC was the History of Art and Design degree. With its dissolution, it lost its link with Winchester School of Art which it formed part until last year. What, therefore, was the Centre able to do? Rugs (pardon the metaphor) pulled out from under them.

The world will only realise the impact of this in many years and decades to come when the skills required to preserve deteriorating garments, upholstery and other materials are no longer readily available. What is more, the extensive research and experimentation that is required to pioneer new techniques (something that the TCC excels at by a distance) will have not been undertaken. Just as we are realising this is happening in other parts of the conservation world (look out for ICOMOS-UK’s Action on Skills conference at the Prince’s Foundation on 29-30 April) why is this happening?

I look forward to reading 10 Downing Street’s response to a petition that was set up for the government to intervene. It closes on 6 May and already has over 3200 signatures. Please sign.

Share and Enjoy:
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb

Social Networking and Heritage

I was reading Mia Ridge’s blog post on the resistance to the participatory web from within the cultural heritage sector, and combined with my planning a trip to Cornwall where I plan to see some megalithic monuments, it really started me thinking.

Where would be best to get some good, practical information about visiting stone circles, for example, in the Penzance region? Let’s start off where most people do, a Google search. Here’s my query: “stone circles penzance“. The first result is Andy Burnham’s old website giving lots of useful information on good sites to visit in the Penzance area. It provides links to the Megalithic Portal, which has its own community of users and contributors.

The second result (at the time of writing) is from The Modern Antiquarian. There I can find thousands of user-submitted photos, forum postings, practical tips on visiting from people who actually visited, and I can get involved myself and ask some questions.

Nowhere on the first few pages of results were any “official” organisations. That’s a shame. So, getting curious, I tried searching for some specific sites. I’d love to visit the fabulous Iron Age and Roman site of Carn Euny again. It’s custodian’s website, English Heritage, comes a sad 10th, only just on the first page of results. What comes first?

Heritage websites which incorporate social networking, of course! Right up there at the top is Wikipedia (which certainly has social aspects to it), then we have The Modern Antiquarian, Stone Pages (which has been around since the web began and incorporates forums), and the Megalithic Portal.

A search for the beautiful Boscawen-Un stone circle even has on the first page of results a video on YouTube complete with music inspired by a visit to the monument.

People like to talk about ancient sites, they like to share their photos and experiences. These websites are all great examples of the vibrancy of feeling about our ancient past.

So where am I going with this post? As ‘official’ heritage bodies such as museums and archaeology units begin to adopt social networking techniques and technologies into their own websites, as Mia suggests, they ought to get “…familiar with the environments in which their content might appear”. There’s a lot to be learned from what is already being done, and there’s a lot we (talking as a heritage professional) can do to help make the online heritage ’scene’ a lot more interesting for everyone.

Share and Enjoy:
  • BlinkList
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb